Prioritizing Indicators in the make Smart Process (Case Study: Kerman City)

Document Type : .

Authors

• Marzieh Afzali ¹
• Mehdi Modiri ²
• Rahmat allah Farhudi ³

¹ Ph.D. Student of Geography and Urban Planning, Department of Geography, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran.

² Associate Professor of Geography and Urban Planning, Department of Geography, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran (CA).

³ Assistant Professor of Geography and Urban Planning, Department of Geography, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

The making-smart process in cities is to create new cities and Making-Smart existing cities. The smart city has six components of economy, people, governance, environment, mobility and Smart life. The total of these components has 33 criteria and the total of criteria has 74 indicators. According to the making-smart projects of the cities of the world, there can be found less urban that simultaneously the conditions of each of the six components of the smart city. The results of the research showed that ranks 1 to 4 are related to the poverty rate index and the poverty rate indicator (smart life component); employment index and unemployment index (both subset of smart economy component). These four indicators, all have a Friedman coefficient of 15.63 and a standard deviation of close to zero. This situation shows that the economic and livelihood issues of the people have caused the main priorities of making-smart in Kerman to be focused on the experts from the field of Kerman's making-smart related areas, which is the fact that smart cities of the Third World, especially in the city study should be considered. However, the indicator of the importance of citizenship and the importance of politics for residents (both with Friedman coefficient 6.68 and standard deviation of 0.51), the index of personal computers (with Friedman coefficient of 5.9 and deviation Criteria 0.51) and sunshine time index (with Friedman coefficient 5. 25 and standard deviation of 0.489) were placed in the final priorities of 71 to 74, respectively.

Keywords

• Smart City Indicators
• Priority Indicators
• Smart-Making
• Kerman City
• friedman test

20.1001.1.22285229.1397.9.35.2.5

---

References

1. احدنژاد، محسن؛ حاضری، صفیه؛ مشکینی، ابوالفضل؛ پیری، عیسی؛ (1397). شناسایی عوامل کلیدی مؤثر برشکوفایی شهری با رویکرد آینده­نگاری (مطالعه‌ی موردی: کلانشهر تبریز). نشریه‌ی پژوهش و برنامه­ریزی شهری، سال 9، شماره‌ی 32، صص 30-15.
2. امامقلی، مصطفی؛ هدایت، هما؛ (1396). تدوین راهبردهای دستیابی به شهر هوشمند در فضای کلانشهری با استفاده از روش SWOT-AHP (مطالعه‌ی موردی: منطقه‌ی 12 شهرداری تهران). مجله‌ی نخبگان علوم و مهندسی، جلد 2، شماره‌ی 3، صص 280-272.
3. روستایی، شهریور؛ پورمحمدی، محمدرضا؛ قنبری، حکیمه؛ (1396). بررسی نقش ساختاری حکمروایی خوب شهری در ایجاد شهرهای هوشمند (نمونه‌ی مورد مطالعه: شهرداری تبریز). نشریه‌ی پژوهش و برنامه­ریزی شهری، سال 8، شماره‌ی 31، صص 146-123.
4. فلاح، مسعود؛ استقلال، احمد؛ (1393). مروری بر مفاهیم، شاخص ها و معیارهای شهر هوشمند. فصلنامه‌ی شهر هوشمند، سال 1، شماره‌ی 1، صص 10-1.
5. قیسوندی، حمید؛ قیسوندی، آرمان؛ قیسوندی، کیهان؛ (1390). شهر هوشمند، تکوین انقلاب شهری نوین. نخستین همایش ملّی آرمان شهر ایران.
6. یوسفی قلعه­سلیمی، نیلوفر؛ (2016). امکان سنجی اجرای شهر هوشمند (مطالعه‌ی موردی: منطقه‌ی 5 شهرداری اصفهان)، کنفرانس بین­المللی مهندسی عمران، معماری و CityScape، ترکیه: دانشگاه استانبول.
   1. 7.      Adegboyega, Ojo., Edward,Curry,, Tomasz, Janowski., (2014). Designing next generation smart cuty initiatives-harnessing findings and lesson from a study of ten smart city programs. Insight Centre for Data Analytics, National University of Ireland, Galway.
   2. 8.      AL-Hader, Mahmoud., Rodzi, Ahmad., (2009). The smart city Infrastructure Development and Monitoring. Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Vol.4, No.2 (11), pp.87-94.
   3. 9.      Bakıcı, T., Almirall, E., Wareham, J., (2012). A Smart City initiative: The case of Barcelona. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, No.2(1), pp.1–14.
   4. 10.  Bătăgan, L., (2011). Smart cities and sustainability models. Informatică Economică, No.15(3), pp.80–87.
   5. 11.  Batty, M., Axhausen, K.W., Giannotti, F., Pozdnoukhov, A., Bazzani, A., Wachowicz, M., Ouzounis, G. Portugali, Y., (2012). Smart cities of the future. European Physical Journal Special Topics, Vol.214, No.1.
   6. 12.  Bhavan, Manak., Shah.Zafar.Marg, Bahadur., (2016). Draft Indian standard, smart cities indicators lCS 13.020.20. Bureau of Indian Standards. Smart Cities Sectional Committee, Last Date for Comments: CED 59 (10000) WC.
   7. 13.  Boulton, A., Brunn, S.D., Devriendt, L., (2011). Cyberinfrastructures and smart world cities: Physical, human, and soft infrastructures. International Handbook of Globalization and World Cities. In Taylor, P., Derudder, B., Hoyler, M., & Witlox, F. (Eds).
   8. 14.  Chen, T.M., (2010). Smart grids, smart cities need better networks [Editor's note]. IEEE Network, No.24(2), pp.2–3.
   9. 15.  Dirks, S., Gurdgiev, C., Keeling, M., (2010). Smarter cities for smarter growth: How cities can optimize their systems for the talent-based economy. IBM Global Business Services, Somers, NY. Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/ papers.cfm? abstract_id=2001907 (visited 25 July 2013).
   10. 16.  Eger, J.M., (2009). Smart growth, smart cities, and the crisis at the pump a worldwide phenomenon. I-Ways, No.32(1), pp.47–53.
   11. 17.  Gartner., (2011). The Gartner blog network. Available at: http://www.gartner.com/technology/home.jsp.
   12. 18.  GhaffarianHoseini, A., Dahlan, N., Berardi, U., GhaffarianHoseini, A., Makaremi, N., (2013). Sustainable energy performances of green buildings: A reviewof current theories, implementations and challenges. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, No.25, pp.1–17.
   13. 19.  Giffinger, R., HGudrun, H., (2010). Smart cities ranking: An effective instrument for the positioning of cities. Architecture, City and Environment, Vol.4, No.12, pp.7–25.
   14. 20.  Giffinger, R., Pichler-Milanovic, N., (2007). Smart cties: ranking of European.
   15. 21.  Hollands, R.G., (2008). Will the real smart city please stand up? Journal of City. No.12(3), pp.303-320.
   16. 22.  José.Luis.Alfaro, Navarro., Víctor.Raúl.López, Ruiz., Domingo.Nevado, Peña., (2016). The effect of ICT use and capability on knowledge-based cities. Journal of Cities, No.60, pp.272–280.
   17. 23.  Juan, Gabriel., Cegarra, Navarro., José, Rodrigo., Córdoba, Pachón., Jos, Luis.,  Moreno, Cegarra., (2012). E-government and citizen's engagement with local affairs through ewebsites: The case of Spanish municipalities. International Journal of Information Management, Vol.32, Issue.5, pp.469–478.
   18. 24.  Klein, C., Kaefer, G., (2008). From smart homes to smart cities: Opportunities and challenges from an industrial perspective. In S. Balandin, D. Moltchanov, & Y. Koucheryavy (Eds.), Next generation teletraffic and wired/wireless advanced networking. 1st Russian conference on smart. Berlin Heidelberg, NewYork: Springer. pp.260–261.
   19. 25.  Komninos, N., (2011). Intelligent cities: variable geometries of spatial intelligence.Intelligent Buildings International, No.3(3), pp.172–188.
   20. 26.  Komninos, N., Pallot, M., Schaffers, H., (2013). Smart cities and the future internet in Europe. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, No.4(2), pp.119–134.
   21. 27.  Lombardi, P., Giordano, S., Farouh, H., Yousef, W., (2012). Modelling the smart city performance. Innovation. The European Journal of Social Science Research, No.25(2), pp.137–149.
   22. 28.  Manville, Catriona., Cochrance, Gavin., Cave, Jonathan., Millard, Jeremy., Pederson, Jimmy.Kevin., Thaarup, Rasmus.Kåre., Liebe, Andrea., Wissner, Matthias., Massink, Roel., Kotterink, Bas., (2014). Mapping Smart Cities in the EU. Directorate General for Internal Policies (Policy Department A: Economic and Scientific Policy), European Parliament. Equested by the European Parliament's Committee on Industry, Research and Energy.
   23. 29.  Monzon, A., (2015). Smart cities concept and challenges: Bases for the assessment of smart city projects. 4^th international conference on smart cities and green ICT systems, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, pp.17–31.
   24. 30.  OECD., (2010). Green cities programme. Paris: OECD Publishing. Available at: www.oecd.org/gov/regional-policy/49318965.pdf.
   25. 31.  Pilar, Carbó-Ramírez, Iriana, Zuria., (2011). The value of small urban greenspaces for birds in a Mexican city. Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol.100, Issue.3, pp.213-222. doi.org/10.1016/j. landurbplan.2010.12.008.
   26. 32.  Sagl, G., Blaschke, T., Beinat, E., Resch, B., (2012). Ubiquitous geo-sensing for context-aware analysis: Exploring relationships between environmental and human dynamics. Sensors, No.12, pp.9835–9857.
   27. 33.  Schuler, D., (2002). Digital cities and digital citizens. In Digital cities II: Computational and sociological approaches, Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, pp.71–85.
   28. 34.  Taewoo, Nam., Theresa, A.Pardo., (2011). Conceptualizing Smart City with Dimensions of Technology, People, and Institutions. The Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research. College Park, MD, USA, June12–15.
   29. 35.  Toppeta, D., (2010). The Smart City Vision: How Innovation and ICT Can Build Smart, “Livable”, Sustainable Cities. The Innovation Knowledge Foundation.
   30. 36.  Townsend, A.M., (2013). Smart cities: Big data, civic hackers, and the quest for a new utopia. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
   31. 37.  Washburn, D., Sindhu, U., Balaouras, S., Dines, R. A., Hayes, N. M., Nelson, L. E., (2010). Helping CIOs understand “smart city” initiatives: Defining the smart city, its drivers, and the role of the CIO. Cambridge, MA: Forrester Research.
   32. 38.  Zygiaris, S., (2013). Smart City reference model: Assisting planners to conceptualize the building of smart city innovation ecosystems. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, No.4(2), pp.217–231.