Evaluation of branding techniques in image formation of Bushehr city with emphasis on three groups of tourists, citizens and urban experts

Document Type : .

Authors

1 Phd Student of Urban Planning, Department of Architecture and Urban Planning, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran

2 Associative professor, Department of Architecture and Urban Planning, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

In the age of globalization and competition for cities to attract citizens, investors and tourists, the importance of the image of the city and how it was perceived was emphasized. In this era, branding is a great opportunity for cities to focus on the concept of image of the city and use different tools to promote it and attract different audiences in order to economic and social goals. The purpose of this study was to assess the perception of audiences (experts, citizens and tourists) of Bushehr and to evaluate different branding tools in its formation. In this study, first, by qualitative approach and analyzing research literature, identified different components and techniques in branding and then by field study and questionnaire using compare means one-way ANOVA in SPSS software, elements of mental image formation of Bushehr city and differences between groups have been studied. Based on the research literature, the four axes of physical structure, socio-cultural characteristics, facilities and infrastructure, and advertising of branding tools are introduced. The results show that cultural and social indicators (3.25), facilities and infrastructure (3.14) had the highest impact on the individuals mind, and physical structure (2.94) and media advertising (2.03) had the least impact, there was also a significant difference between the three groups of tourists, citizens and experts. Considering the results of this study to enhance the image of Bushehr city from exterior (tourists) and interior (citizens and others) using physical intervention tools to improve the physical space of the city including urban design and landscape along with the use of advertising and Media is essential.
Extended Abstract
Introduction
       With the growth and development of information and communication technology and began the era of globalization, space and time have been compacted. Cities are in the process of competing for a better status by seeking an attractive image of themselves and attracting citizens and other groups, including tourists, investors and elites. In this period, the image of the city, how it is perceived and evaluated, and the communicative nature of the image, is considered more than ever. Urban branding is one of the approaches that has helped cities compete in this process of competitiveness. The focus of this approach is on the structure of the image of the city, how it is shaped and influenced by the audience, in line with economic and social goals. In this process, branding has become a key concept and has driven cities to develop brand strategy. This not only affected the planning approaches but also the image, a key concept that was somewhat distanced from its original origins by Lynch and it was regarded as a communicative, competitive, and valuable nature. Therefore, image recognition of the city has formed the basis of branding and How to influence and enhance image with different branding tools was considered. This research seeks to identify the importance and role of branding tools in shaping the image of audiences (experts, citizens, tourists) by selecting Bushehr as a case study.
Methodology:
        The purpose of this study is applied and in terms of descriptive-analytical method which is done library and field. The sampling method of the three groups of experts, citizens and tourists was non-probable and the sample size of all three groups was calculated based on Cochran formula at 95% confidence level and 0.05 accuracy with 217, 384 and 384 respectively. Citizens 'questionnaires were prepared in all neighborhoods of Bushehr city, tourists' questionnaires in coastal area and residences and experts were provided by urban managers and related university professors. The questionnaire was developed as a Likert spectrum on the effect of each of the different indicators on audience image formation and In SPSS software, by comparing means, the effect of indices and one way regression analysis ANOVA, the significance of responses between the three groups and also binary groups were compared.
Results and discussion:
         Four components of physical structure, socio-cultural characteristics, facilities and infrastructure, and advertising they have been identified as branding tools and shaping the image of the city. Implementation of flagship projects, iconic buildings, historical buildings and contexts alongside urban design and landscape design of physical components, cultural events, rituals and arts, sporting events, popular culture and vitality and social dynamics of cultural component indicators, restaurants and coffee shops. , Accommodation, Access, Shopping Centers and Recreational Infrastructure Includes Facilities and Infrastructure Indicators and all advertising tools including Internet, TV, Social Networking, Logo, icon and City Vision awareness. Surveys revealed that the social and cultural component averaged 3.25, facilities and infrastructure (3.14) had the highest impact on audience minds, and physical structure averaged (2.94) and media advertising (2.03) had the least impact. There was a significant difference between the groups of tourists, citizens and experts in the criteria.
Conclusion:
        Today, the image of the city is used as a communicative and competitive nature to attract different audiences. The branding approach seeks to enhance the image by creating a strong local identity and attractive image for external users. Given that the city has a multifaceted nature and therefore attracts diverse audiences. It is important to consider the goals and needs of audience in order to enhance image and ultimately audience's satisfaction. In Bushehr, to enhance the image of exterior (tourists) and interior (citizens and others) in addition to preserving desirable shades, the use of physical intervention tools such as urban and landscape design along with the use of advertising and media tools seems necessary.

Keywords

References

  1. Asadi, D., Rafiyan, M. (2018): Investigating Effective Factors on Historical Neighborhoods Regeneration with Emphasis on Urban Branding Approach (Case Study: Sang-siah Neighborhood in Shiraz). 6 (24) :5-14
  2. Anholt, S. (2010): Places: Identity, Image and Reputation. Palgrave Macmillan.
  3. Ashworth, G. (2009): The Instruments of Place Branding: How Is It Done?. European Spatial Research And Policy, 16, pp: 20-35
  4. Farhana, M. (2012): Brand Elements Lead to Brand Equity: Differentiate or Die. Information Management and Business Review. 4, pp 223-233.
  5. Gholipour, A., Abuee Ardakan, M., peydayesh, E. (2011): A Study of Key Factors Affecting the Formation of Internal City Image along with Effective Urban Branding', Honar-Ha-Ye-Ziba: Memary Va Shahrsazi, 3(45), pp. 39-48.
  6. Gold, J.R. and Ward, S.V. (1994): Place Promotion: The Use of Publicity and Marketing to Sell Towns and Regions (Book Review). Town Planning Review, 66, 3,pp 329–343.
  7. Kasapi, I., Cella, A. (2017): Destination Branding: A Review of the City Branding Literature.Mediterranean Journal of  Social Sciences, 8 (4), pp: 129-142
  8. Kavaratzis, M. and Ashworth, G.J. (2005): City Branding: An Effective Assertion of Identity or A Transitory Marketing Trick? Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 96(5), pp: 506–514.
  9. Kavaratzis, M. (2004):  From city marketing to city branding: Towards a theoretical framework for developing city brands. Place Branding, 1, pp: 58–73
  10. Kotler, P. (2000): Marketing Management(Millenium Edition ed.). Prentice-Hall.
  11. Hubbard, P. And Hall, T. (1998): The Entrepreneurial City And The ‘New Urban Politics’, In Hall, T., Hubbard, P. (Eds), The Entrepreneurial City: Geographies Of Politics, Regimes And Representations, Wiley, Chichester, pp: 1-23
  12. Jansson, J. and Power, D. (2006): Image of the City: Urban Branding as Constructed Capabilities in Nordic City Regions. Department of Social and Economic Geography, Uppsala University, pp: 1-45
  13. Mohammadifar, Y., Rousta, A., Gharehche, M., &Hamidizadeh. M. (2018): The Necessities and Consequences of City Branding and Emphasizing the Economy of Urban Tourism. Urban Economics and Management, 6(1(21)),pp: 55-69
  14. Mohammadi, A., Maroofi, S. (2018): Evaluation of urban branding strategies in Iranian cities. International Journal of Human Capital in Urban Management, 3(2),pp 153-166.
  15. Moradi, F., Zarabadi, S., and Majedi, H. (2018): An Explanation of City Branding Model in order to Promote City Competitiveness and Economic Growth by Using of F'ANP Model. Urban Economics and Management, 6(2(22)),pp177-199
  1. Nourian, F., mikaeili, M. (2018): Modeling the city’s image in order to determine the priorities of city branding case study: Urmia City, Honar-Ha-Ye-Ziba: Memary Va Shahrsazi, 23(1), pp. 31-40.
  2. Rousta, A., Ghare che, M., Hamidizadeh, M., Mohammadifar, Y. (2016): A Model for City Branding in Iran Based on the Grounded Theory, Brand Management, 3(1), pp. 41-68.
  1. Pecot, F. and De Barnier, V. (2015): City Brand Management: the role of Brand Heritage in City Branding. Conference: 14th International Marketing Trends Congress IMTC, At Paris, pp: 1-14
  2. Prilenska, V. (2012): City Branding as a Tool for Urban Regeneration: Towards a Theoretical Framework, Architecture and Urban Planning, pp. 12-16
  3. Popescu, G.V. (2017): From local to global with city branding. Ecoforum, 6, 1(10), pp 1-16
  4. Rizzi, P. and Dioli, I. (2010): From Strategic Planning to City Branding: Some Empirical in Italy. Revista de Turismo y Patrimonio Cultural, 8, pp: 39-49
  5. Rehan, R. M, (2013): Urban branding as an effective sustainability tool in urban development. HBRC Journal, 10(2), pp.222-230.
  6. Riza, M., Doratli, N. and Fasli M.,(2012): City Branding and Identity. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 35, pp: 293 – 300
  7. Richard G., Wilson J., (2004): The impact of cultural events on city image: Rotterdam, capital of europe 2001. Urban Studies, 41( 10),pp: 1931–1951
  1. Sarvari, H. and Majedi, H. (2012): The Role of Urban Design on the Branding of Urban Space, International Journal Of  Architecture and Urban Development, 2(2),pp 68
  2. Villar, F. R. C. (2018): City branding and the theory of social representation. Bitacora28 (1),pp 31-36
  3. Yazdanpanah Shahabadi, M., Sajadzadeh, H., Rafieian, M. (2019): Developing a Conceptual Model for Place Branding: A Review of Theoretical Literature, The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh- E Nazar, 16(71), pp. 19-34.
  4. Yoon. J, (2010): A Conceptual Model for City Branding Based on Semiotics. A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Department of Engineering and Design, Brunel University.
  5. Zenker,  S.  and  Martin,  N.  (2011):  Measuring success in place marketing and branding. Place  Branding  and  Public  Diplomacy, 7(1),pp 32-41.
  6. Zenker, S. and Braun, E. (2010): Branding a City: A Conceptual Approach for Place Branding and Place Brand Management. 39th EMAC Annual Conference 2010, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
  7. Zhang, L. Zhao, S. (2009): City branding and the Olympic effect: A case study of Beijing. Cities 26 , pp: 245–254.

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 24 August 2019
  • Revise Date: 29 September 2019
  • Accept Date: 18 October 2019

Share

How to cite

Statistics