Investigation of key drivers affecting the regeneration of dysfunctional urban tissues Case study: Worn texture of Urmia

Document Type : .

Authors

1 phd student of Geography and urban planning, Tabriz Branch, Islamic azad university, Tabriz, Iran

2 Assistant Professor of Department of Geography and urban planning, Tabriz branch, Islamic azad university, Tabriz,Iran,

3 Assistant Professor of Department of Geography and Urban planning,PNU University,Tehran,Iran

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: Urban inefficiencies in comparison with other areas of the city have lagged behind the development process and have been separated from the evolutionary cycle of life and have become the focus of problems and inadequacies. These tissues hold a high percentage of the urban population and at the same time have many latent capacities and capabilities for future urban development. Therefore, in the present study, an attempt has been made to systematically investigate the key drivers affecting the reconstruction of inefficient Uremia city.
Methodology: The present study is applied in terms of purpose and descriptive-analytical in nature. Both library and field methods have been used to collect information. The study area of Uremia and the statistical population of the study include 30 experts who have been selected as snowballs. Environmental and Delphi scanning methods and Micmac software have been used for data analysis.
Results: Based on the findings of Micmac software, among the 46 primary factors affecting the regeneration of dysfunctional tissues in Uremia, 15 factors, including; Employment and unemployment of people living in Texture, the amount of private investment, banking facilities and land and housing prices, attracting the participation of residents, adapting projects to the needs and lifestyle of residents, lack of good urban governance, lack of integrated and clear policy in the face of dysfunctional structures Urban, defects and inefficiencies of urban plans, inconsistency of policies and actions of devices, readability, improvement and provision of infrastructure services and facilities, access to public transport at the texture level, quality of buildings and provision of pedestrian and pedestrian access have been selected as key factors.
Discussion and Conclusion: According to the research results, socio-political dimension with 6 variables, physical-environmental dimension with 5 variables and finally economic dimension with 4 variables have the greatest impact on the regeneration of dysfunctional urban structures in Uremia, respectively.

Keywords


  1. Asadi, D., Rafieian, M. (2015), A Study of the Factors Affecting the Recreation of Historic Sites with Emphasis on the Urban Branding Approach: A Case Study: Shiraz Black Stone Neighborhood, Haft Hesar Environmental Studies, No. 24, Volume 6, pp. 5-14.
  2. Bahadorinejad, M., Zaker Haghighi, K. (2016). Explaining the mechanism of revitalization of historical textures using the regeneration approachCase study: Haji neighborhood in the historical area of ​​Hamadan, Haft Hesar Journal of Environmental Studies, 5(18): 5-18. (In Persian).
  3. Bahreini, H., Izadi, M.S., Mofidi, M. (2013). Approaches and policies of urban renewal (from reconstruction to sustainable urban regeneration, Quarterly Journal of Urban Studies, 3(9): 17-30. (In Persian).
  4. Bakhtiari, L., Sasanpour, F., Shamaei, Ali; Soleimani Mehranjani., M. (2019), Analysis of Factors Affecting Sustainable Urban Reconstruction Case Study: Central Part of Hamadan, Geographical Quarterly (Regional Planning), Volume 10, Number 1, pp. 123-142.
  5. Benedetto, M., Sabina, T., Piergiuseppe, P. (2020). A model to support the decision-making in urban regeneration, Land Use Policy Volume 99, December 2020, 104865.
  6. Bottero, M., Bragaglia, F., Caruso, N., Datola, G., Dell’Anna, F. (2020). Experimenting community impact evaluation (CIE) for assessing urban regeneration programmes: The case study of the area 22@ Barcelona. Cities, Vol.99, pp 1-16. Doi: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0264275119301453.
  7. Cankut, D. I., Buru, A. (2020). Monitoring the effects of land sizes on private property transformation in an urban regeneration project by regression analysis: Erenler Cedit case study; Kocaeli, Sustainable Cities and Society, 50, pp 1-11.Doi:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2210670718325009.
  8. Dean,K;&Trillo,C.(2019).Assessing sustainability in housing led urban regeneration:Insights from a housing association in Northern England. Architecture MPS, Volume 15(2), 1-18.
  9. Fani, Z., Shirzadi, F. (2018), Analysis of Factors Affecting the Recreation of Historical Spaces in the City Case Study: Mashkh Square, Tehran, Quarterly Journal of Human Settlements Planning Studies, Volume 13, Number 1, pp. 179-197.
  10. Geng, Y., Fujita, T., Bleischwitz, R., Chiu, A., & Sarkis, J. (2019). Accelerating the Transition to Equitable, Sustainable, and Livable Cities: Toward Post-Fossil Carbon Societies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 118020.
  11. Gi-Hyoug, Ch., Jae, H., Gain, L. (2020). Announcement effects of urban regeneration plans on residential property values: Evidence from Ulsan, Korea. Cities Volume 97, February 2020, 102570.
  12. Hataminejad, H., Pourahmad, A., Nosrati Heshi, M. (2019). Futures studies on urban worn-out texture Case Study: District 9 Area 1, Tehran Municipality, Journal of Geographical Data (SEPEHR) 28(109): 37-55. . (In Persian).
  13. Izadfar, E., Sasanpour, F., Tavalayi, S., Soleimani, M. (2020). Sustainable urban regeneration based on scenario design Case study: District 14 of Isfahan Municipality, Geography and urban-regional planning, 34(10): 45-68. (In Persian).
  14. Izadfar, N., Rezaee, M.R (2020). Identifying the key factors affecting sustainable urban regeneration with a futures research approach (Case study: dysfunctional context of Yazd), Geography and urban-regional planning, 34(10): 109-130. (In Persian).
  15. Kearns, A., Ghosh, S., Mason, P., Egan, M. (2019). Urban regeneration and mental health: Investigating the effects of an area-based intervention using a modified intention to treat analysis with alternative outcome measures. Health and Place,61, pp 1-10. Doi: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1353829219305118.
  16. Korkmaz,C;and Balaban,O. )2020(. Sustainability of Urban Regeneration in Turkey: Assessing the Performance of the North Ankara, Urban Regeneration Project, Habitat International, Volume 95, 102081.
  17. López-Contreras, N., Vanessa Puig, B., Alejandra, V., Paola Olave, M., Mercè, G. (2021). Effects of an urban regeneration program on related social determinants of health in Chile: A pre-post intervention study. Health & Place. Volume 68, March 2021, 102511.
  18. Mehan, A. (2016). Urban Regeneration: A Comprehensive Strategy for Achieving Social Sustainability in Historical Squares. International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Sciences and Arts, 2, 863-867.
  19. Nasiri Handeh Khaleh, I.,Salari Nia, M. (2017), Analysis of Effective Factors in Regeneration of Urban Dilapidated Tissues: A Case Study of District 20, District 17, Tehran, Volume 14, Number 55, 135-148
  20. Natividade-Jesus, E., Almeida, A., & Sousa, N. (2019). A Case Study Driven Integrated Methodology to Support Sustainable Urban Regeneration Planning and Management, Sustainability Journals, 11(15), 4129; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11154129.
  21. Pourahmd, A., Habibi, K., Keshavrz, M. (2010). Evolution of the concept of urban regeneration as a new approach in worn-out urban contexts, Iranian Islamic City Studies Quarterly, 1(1): 37-55. (In Persian).
  22. Rasoolimanesh, S. M., Badarulzaman, N., & Jaafar, M. (2012). City Development Strategies (CDS) and Sustainable Urbanization in Developing World. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 36, 623–631.
  23. Rasouli, M., Ahadnejad Rushti, M., Meshkini, A., Heydari, T. (2020). Regeneration Analysis of Urban Decay Textures with Emphasis on the Role and Function of Local Stakeholders with a Foresight Approach (Case Study: Zanjan City). Journal of Urban Research and Planning. (In Persian).
  24. Roberts, P., & Sykes, H. (2000). Urban Regeneration: Handbook. London: Sage Publications.
  25. Stryjakiewicz, T., Kudłak, R., Ciesiółka, P., Kołsut, B., & Motek, P. (2018). Urban Regeneration in Poland’s Non-Core Regions, European Planning Studies, 26(2), 316-341, doi: 10.1080/09654313.2017.1361603.
  26. Xun, L., Fan, Zh., Eddie Chi Man, H., Wei, L. (2020). Collaborative workshop and community participation: A new approach to urban regeneration in China. Cities, Volume 102, July 2020, 102743.
  27. Zhonghua, L., Xiaoling, Zh. (2021). Framing social sustainability and justice claims in urban regeneration: A comparative analysis of two cases in Guangzhou. Land Use Policy Volume 102, March 2021, 105224.