تحلیلی بر عوامل موثر برناپایداری محلات شهری جهت بازآفرینی پایدار (مطالعه موردی: محلات شمالی بافت تاریخی – فرهنگی تبریز)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استاد گروه جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی شهری ، دانشکده برنامه‌ریزی و علوم محیطی، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران.

2 دانشیارگروه جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی شهری ، دانشکده برنامه‌ریزی و علوم محیطی، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران.

3 دانشجوی دکترای رشته جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی شهری، دانشکده برنامه‌ریزی و علوم محیطی، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران

10.30495/jupm.2021.28343.3919

چکیده

بازآفرینی شهری به‌منظور معکوس نمودن جریان تغییر و افت شهری هست. در بستر بازآفرینی شهری گونه‌های جدید سازمانی در حال شکل‌گیری هستند هدف آن‌ها نگاه توسعه از پایین به بالاست، که در آن ‌همه کنشگران درگیر می شود این امر موجب توسعه راه‌حل‌های پایدار در بلندمدت می‌شود در واقع توسعه پایدار جزء لاینفک بازآفرینی جهت بهبود وضعیت در ابعاد مختلف با نگاهی پایدار است برای رسیدن به این امر نیازمند تفکر درباره شهرها با رویکرد جامعه‌محور، یکپارچه، استراتژیک و فراگیر هست .این پژوهش عوامل موثر بر ناپاپداری محلات شمالی بافت تاریخی – فرهنگی تبریز را با رویکرد جامع و آینده پژوهی مورد مطالعه قرار داده است بر این مبنا روش پژوهش ، توصیفی- تحلیلی است. از منظر هدف از دسته تحقیق‌های کاربردی محسوب می‌شود. در جهت دستیابی به متغیرهای تحقیق به مرور پیشینه پژوهش پرداخته شد. متغیرهای بدست آمده، از طریق مصاحبه با متخصصان مورد بررسی قرار گرفت در نهایت 39 متغییر به عنوان عوامل موثر بر ناپایداری محلات شمالی بافت های تاریخی – فرهنگی شهر تبریز شناسایی شد. در این پژوهش از شاخص های اقتصادی، اجتماعی، کالبدی، زیست محیطی و مدیریتی استفاده شده است . سرانجام در قالب پرسشنامه به شکل ماتریس 39 *39 طبق نمونه گیری هدفمند در اختیار 15 نفر از کارشناسان و متخصصان که شناخت کافی در این زمینه داشتند؛ قرار گرفت. داده های به کار رفته در این پرسشنامه به صورت کمی و از طریق وزن دهی دلفی تهیه شده و جهت تجزیه و تحلیل داده ها وارد نرم افزار Mic Mac شده است . یافته های تحقیق نشان داد که 15 عامل نقش کلیدی در پایداری محلات مورد مطالعه دارند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

An analysis of the factors affecting the instability of urban neighborhoods for sustainable regeneration (Case study: Northern neighborhoods of the historical-cultural context of Tabriz)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Rasoul Ghorbani 1
  • Akbar Asagari Zamani 2
  • mahdieh tahooni 3
1 Prof, Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Faculty of Planning and Environmental Sciences, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.
2 Associate Prof, Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Faculty of Planning and Environmental Sciences, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
3 Ph.D. Student in of Geography and Urban Planning, Faculty of Planning and Environmental Sciences, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Urban regeneration is to reverse the flow of urban change and decline. In the context of urban regeneration, new types of organizations are being formed. Their goal is to look at development from the bottom up, in which all actors are involved. This leads to the development of sustainable solutions in the long run. Sustainable regeneration is an integral part of improving the situation in various dimensions with a sustainable perspective. To achieve this requires thinking about cities with a community-oriented, integrated, strategic and inclusive approach, and through the sustainability approach can achieve sustainable regeneration. Affecting the unpopularity of the northern neighborhoods has studied the historical-cultural context of Tabriz with a comprehensive and futuristic approach. Based on this, the research method is descriptive-analytical. It is considered as a category of applied research in terms of purpose. In order to achieve the research variables, the research background was reviewed. The variables obtained were examined through interviews with experts. Finally, 39 variables were identified as effective factors for the instability of the northern neighborhoods of the historical-cultural contexts of Tabriz. In this research, economic, social, physical, environmental and managerial indicators have been used. Finally, in the form of a questionnaire in the form of a 39 39 39 matrix, according to purposeful sampling, it was provided to 15 experts and specialists who had sufficient knowledge in this field; it placed. The data used in this questionnaire were prepared quantitatively by Delphi weighting and entered into Mic Mac software for data analysis. Findings showed that 15 factors play key roles in the sustainability of the study areas.
Extended Abstract
 
 
Introduction
 
What has destroyed the stability of the northern neighborhoods of the historical-cultural context of Tabriz; The lack of a historical-cultural context plan is in line with the rules and regulations of urban planning, and as a result, ill-considered and erratic interventions have caused more instability in the studied context. Over the years, the density of texture has increased and the change of uses, especially the neglect of valuable historical-cultural uses, has become more problematic, and as a result, the hierarchy of communication networks does not respond to the existing density and uses. If current trends; The integration of historical-cultural contexts in the northern part of Tabriz will gradually disappear with the change of living methods and its consequences and the lack of balance between economic, social and environmental dimensions of historical and cultural contexts and the inefficiency of neighborhoods will increase day by day. As long as projects lead to constructions that respond only to economic demands, the long-term needs of citizens are ignored and the opportunity to preserve and create vibrant neighborhoods and sustainable communities is lost. In this case, households that have high financial capacity and are considered as the main driver of urban development and regeneration, will leave these neighborhoods and eventually these neighborhoods will have their meaning as a factor in establishing a social identity that once alleys and back alleys of these The segments were an emotional source for us, they are lost and the tissue instability intensifies.
 
Methodology
The research method is based on the nature, subject and objectives of each research. The research method in terms of nature is a combination of descriptive-analytical methods and in terms of purpose, is part of the category of applied research. In general, the present article consists of two parts: the study and analysis of theoretical foundations and research background; To identify the dimensions and components and the second part includes providing a process model using interpretive structural modeling; This method, in a structured and systematic way, seeks to shape and understand the relationships between the elements in a complex system. The obtained variables were examined through interviews with experts (university professors and city managers). Finally, 39 variables were identified as factors affecting the instability of the northern neighborhoods of the historical-cultural contexts of Tabriz. Finally, the questionnaire in the form of 39 ⃰ 39 matrix according to purposeful sampling was provided to 15 experts and specialists who had sufficient knowledge in this field; it placed. The data used in this questionnaire were prepared quantitatively by Delphi weighting and then the scores were entered in a cross-matrix to determine the effectiveness and impact of each in the framework of Mic Mac software.
Results and discussion
The most important purpose of this study is to identify the factors affecting the instability of the northern neighborhoods of the historical-cultural contexts of Tabriz, of which 15 factors were identified as key variables out of 39 factors. The results of this study showed that among the factors, managerial factors play an important role and social, economic, physical and environmental factors are in the next rank, respectively. Therefore, the result of this research is in line with the results of the research of Hook et al, Who believe that in the city, not only the physical dimensions but also the broad social relations and institutional dimensions of sustainability should be emphasized; Correspond. And with Stanjelia research, which describes the dimensions of different levels of decision-making and considers the decision support system to be effective in defining alternative scenarios, and leads government officials to select the most performance in terms of environmental, social and economic sustainability; Is consistent. But with the research of Pourahmad et al, Who believe that instability is the economic dimension of the tissue, which leads to instability of other dimensions of the tissue, and finally manifests itself in the form of physical instability. It is not consistent because in this research there are management institutions that have had the greatest impact on the economic and physical dimensions.Therefore, the following solutions are suggested:- Considering the outcome of the hierarchy of communication networks in the study area by service (tourism, recreation), social and economic communications. - Grounding the presence of all actors, especially the local community - Capacity building and management based on expertise - Enhancing the cooperative institutional capacities of all actors by using the capacities of local institutions (formal and informal) including religious boards, mosques' trustees, voluntary organizations and non-governmental organizations, etc. as social leaders; Because in the current situation, the creation of new structures not only does not improve the process of cooperative governance, but also means increasing the number of inter-institutional conflicts. In contrast, the reform of processes and procedures as institutional contexts for the realization of urban regeneration with a collaborative approach and based on interaction between different actors based on their role, tasks and performance can provide the basis for cooperative governance in urban regeneration management.- Considering the inefficiencies and challenges in socio-economic dimensions and its manifestation in physical dimensions in these neighborhoods, the presence of government institutions and the public sector in this process and financial support, especially in providing public services and creating legal support are necessary.
 
Conclusion
In this study, after identifying the variables affecting the regeneration of urban sustainability in the study area, a questionnaire was prepared as a 39  ⃰ 39 matrix. The questionnaire is arranged in such a way that variables of the rows affect the variables of the columns; So the row variables are affected and the column variables are affected. Therefore, the relationship of each variable to each other is quantified and with numbers from 0 to 3, the number zero means no relationship, the number one means a weak relationship, the number two means moderate relationship and the number three has a strong relationship. Depending on which part of the matrix the sum of the values of the matrix is located; 5 categories of variables can be identified. Zone 1: Input Variables, zone 2: Intermdiate Variables, zone 3: Resultant Variables, zone 4: Excluded Variables, zone 5: Cluster variables – indeterminate. In this study, the dispersion pattern generally indicates the status of an unstable system. The propellants are generally positioned around the diagonal axis in a similar position. So that the selected propellants have a lot of scattered action and reaction to each other. Basis in this study: out of 39 factors, 2 economic factors (employment and inflation), 4 social factors (literacy, people's desire to live, net population density, social capital), 3 physical factors (determining land use using standards on Basis of general practical goals and community perspectives, hierarchy, level of satisfaction with parking situation), 1 environmental factor (green space per capita) and 5 management factors (management style, centralization of government offices and centers in the capital, performance of regulatory bodies, tax laws And government budget allocation) are involved in the instability of the study area. Examining the rank values of direct and indirect relationships of key variables indicates that the rank values of the direct effects of key variables on indirect effects are repeated with little change.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Urban Reconstruction
  • Sustainable Development
  • Historical-Cultural Context
  • Futurology
  • Tabriz
  1. References

     

    1. Adabi. M. (2008). Recreating the Language of Common Patterns between the Old and New Layers of the City. The First Conference on Urban Dilapidated Textures. Perspectives on Sustainable Development. Values and Challenges. Ahvaz. 1 . [In Persian]
    2. Aghasafari. A. Amiri. H. Dansh. J. Beheshtian. M. J. (2010). Qualitative Characteristics of Housing in the Historical Texture of Yazd (2006-2016). Iranian-Islamic Urban Studies Quarterly. 2. 67-82. [In Persian]
    3. Alehashemi. A.. Mansouri. S. A. & Berati. N. (2016). Urban Infrastructure and the Necessity of Changing the View in Narif and Its Planning (Infrastructure of a New Conceptual Perspective in the Definition of Twenty-First Century Urban Infrastructure). Bagh-e Nazar Magazine. 43. 5-16. [In Persian]
    4. Aliakbari. I. Pourahmad. A. Jalabadi. L. (2018). Identifying the drivers of the effect on the future of sustainable tourism in Kerman with a futures research approach. Journal of Tourism and Development. 6(1). 156-178. [In Persian]
    5. Asghari. M. Ahmadi. F. Shirin Toghyani. SH. Ostadi. M. (2018). Spatial Prioritization of Strategic Urban Renovation Localization Projects in Shahid Hasheminejad Neighborhood of Mashhad. Geographical Research Quarterly. 2(129). [In Persian]
    6. Askarian. R. Khorrambakht. A. Afifi. M. E. (2020). Developing a model for planning and integrated management of historical contexts in order to recreate. Journal of Urban Research and Planning. Article ready to be published. [In Persian]
    7. Asma. M. (2016). Urban Regeneration: A Comprehensive Strategy For Achieving Social Sustainability. Publisher SGEM2016 Conference Proceedings. 4. 861-868.
    8. Assefa. G. & Frostell. B. (2007). Social sustainability and social acceptance in technology assessment: Acase study of energy technologies. Technology in society. 29(1). 63-78.
    9. Azarniush. M. Ravanjoo. A. (2014). A Study of Visual Pollution and Its Indicators in Iranian Cities (Case Study: Shushtar).. Journal of the Faculty of Arts. 6. 75-92. [In Persian]
    10. Bahraini. S. H.  Izadi. M. S. Mofidi. M. (2014). Approaches to Urban Renovation Policies (From Reconstruction to Sustainable Urban Reconstruction). (Urban Studies Quarterly. 3(9). [In Persian]
    11. Barbari. M. J. Kalantari; A.H. Raghfar; H. Ghaffari. G. R. (2017). The Impact of Natural Resources on the Development of Countries. Geography and Environmental Sustainability. 7(3). (Serial Number 24). 81-96. [In Persian]
    12. Bottero. M. Bragaglia. F. Caruso. N. Datola. G. Anna. F. (2020). Experimenting community impact evaluation (CIE). for assessing urban regeneration programmes: The case study of the area 22@ Barcelona. Cities. 99.20-36.
    13. Chahardowli. M. Sajadzadeh. H. Aram. F. Mosavi. A. (2020). Survey of Sustainable Regeneration of Historic and Cultural Cores of Cities. Energies. 13. Publisher: MDPI.11.50-72.
    14. Chandan. S. & Kumar. A. (2019). Review of urban conservation practices in historic cities. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. 10. 74–84.
    15. Ciardom. F. Angelis. J. D. Marino. B.F.M. ActisGrosso. R. (2020). Social categorization and joint attention: Interacting effects of age. sex. and social status. Acta Psychologica. 212. 1-14.
    16. Colantonio. A. & Dixon. T. (2009). Measuring Socially Sustainable Urban Regeneration in Europe. Oxford Institute for Sustainable Development (OISD). School of the Built Environment Oxford Brookes University.
    17. Colantonio. A. & Dixon. T. (2011). Urban Regeneration & Social Sustainability: Best Practice from European Cities. 18-36.
    18. Cornian. A. m. & Lee. E. (2021). Resituating the political in cultural intermediary work: Charity sector public relations and communication. European Journal of Cultural Studies.1-18.
    19. Couch. Ch. F. & Percy. S. (2008). Urban regeneration in Europe. Blackwell Science Ltd.
    20. Czischke. D. Moloney. C. Turcu. C. (2015). Raising the game in environmentally sustainable urban regeneration. regeneration in urban areas. URBACT II Capitalization. 6–14.
    21. Daneshpour. A.  Shiri. E. (2016). Physical-Functional Elements Shaping the Identity of Historical Textures of the Islamic Iranian City. Naghsh Jahan. 1(5). 17-25. [In Persian]
    22. Emami. S. M. & Zabrdast. E. (2014). Evaluation of urban development plans based on the principle of interconnection using the AHP method. 19-36. [In Persian]
    23. Evans. J. P. (2012). Sustainable regeneration. In H. Lovell. M. Elsenga. & Smith. S. (Eds.). International Encyclopedia of housing and home. Elsevier.
    24. Flamaki. M. (2018). Loss of buildings in historical cities. University of Tehran. 13th edition. [In Persian]
    25. Galdini. R. (2005). Urban Regeneration process: the case of Genova. an example of integrated urban development approach. Genova Department of sociology and social science 45th Congress of the European Regional Science. (ERSA). Louvain-la-Neuve.
    26. Habibi. K. (2007). Improvement and Renovation of Ancient Urban Textures. First Edition. Tehran. [In Persian]
    27. Habibi. M. & Khabiri. S. (2017). Urban Reconstruction Policy: Perspectives and Necessities. Haft Shahr Journal of Urban Planning and Architecture. 4(62). 22-27. [In Persian]
    28.  Hanachi. P. Fadaei Nejad. S. (2011). Developing a Conceptual Framework for Integrated Conservation and Recreation in Cultural-Historical Textures. Journal of Fine Arts. Architecture and Urban Planning. Volume 3. Number 46 - Serial Number 940282.  15- 26. [In Persian]
    29. Hargroves. K. & Smıth. M. (2005). The Natural Advantage of Nations: Business Opportunity. Innovation. andGovernance in the 21st Century (London: Earthscan/ James and James).
    30. Hashemi. E. & Gholimardani. M. (2015). A Study of the Dimensions of the Conceptual Framework of Conservation-Based Reconstruction in Historical Urban Textures of Iran. Quarterly Journal of Urban Design Studies and Urban Research. Third Year. 5(51). 15-28. [In Persian]
    31. Hassan. G. F. (2012). Regeneration as an approach for the development of informal settlements in Cairo metropolitan. Alexandria Engineering Journal.51. 229-239.
    32. Iran Urban Regeneration Company (IURC). (2017). Numerous challenges and problems of cities in dysfunctional areas of cities. Ministry of Roads and Urban Development Publications. [In Persian]
    33. Izadfar. E. Sasanpour; F. Tavalayi; S. Soleimani. M. (2016). Sustainable Urban Reconstruction Based on Scenario Planning. Geography and Urban-Regional Planning. 10(34). 45-68. [In Persian]
    34. Izadfar. N. & Rezaei. M.R. (2020). Identifying the key factors affecting sustainable urban regeneration with a future research approach (Case study: dysfunctional context of Yazd). Geography and Urban Planning. 10(34). 109-130. [In Persian]
    35. Izadi. Naskhian; SH. Mohammadi. M. (2018). Explaining the Conceptual Framework of Sustainable Reconstruction of Historical Textures. Parseh Archaeological Studies. 2(6) 161-177. [In Persian]
    36. Jenkins. R. (1996). Social Identity. London. Routledge.
    37. KhanMohammadi. M. Ghaleh Noei.M.  (2016). Culture-Based Reconstruction through the Development of Creative Industries and Explaining Cultural Neighborhoods in the Historical Textures of the City. Restoration and Architecture of Iran (Restoration of Cultural Historical Works and Textures). 6(12). 67-84. [In Persian]
    38. Korkmaz. C. and Balaban. O. (2020). Sustainability of urban regeneration in Turkey: Assessing the performance of the North Ankara Urban Regeneration Project. Habitat International.95. 63-87.
    39. Kotval. Z. (2001). Measuring the effectiveness of downtown revitalization strategies. in: C. Balsas (Ed). Urbanism Comercial em Portual. Necessidade de uma Nova Gesiao Urbana (Lisbon. URBE and CMPV). 43 – 49.
    40. Lang. T. (2005). Insights in the British Debate about Urban Decline and Urban Regeneration. Working Paper. Erkner. Leibniz-Institute for Regional Development and Structural Planning.
    41. Lotfi. S. (2011). Genealogy of urban regeneration. from reconstruction to renaissance. first edition. Azarakhsh Publications. Tehran. [In Persian]
    42. Maclaren. V. (1996). Urban sustainability reporting.Journal of the American Planning Association. 62(2).184–203.
    43. Meshkini. A. Movahed. A. Ahmadifard. N. (2016). A Study of Regeneration Policy in Dilapidated Urban Weaves Using SWOT and QSPM Matrix Geographical Research on Urban Planning. 4(4).549-568. [In Persian]
    44. Mohamadizadeh. N. Majedi; H. Saeedi Zarabadi. Z.S. (2016). Presenting a Conceptual Model of Criteria of Cohesion and Blending in the Texture of Historical Neighborhoods with Each Other (Case Study: Historical Texture Neighborhoods of Kerman. Region 1). Baghe Nazar. 15(61). 39-52. [In Persian]
    45. Movahed. A.  Pegah Yazdi. G. (2013). The Functioning of Sustainable Urban Reconstruction Approach in Suburban Neighborhoods Human Geography Research. Volume 45. Number 1 (consecutive 83).105-122. [In Persian]
    46. NejadEbrahimi. A. & Nejaddagi. A. (2018(. Regeneration of acommunity-oriented city through education based on the philosophy of Islamic realism in the historical context of Sorkhab neighborhood of Tabriz. Journal of Urban Research and Planning. 9(35). 139-150. [In Persian]
    47. Ng. M.K. (2005). Quality of life perceptions and directions for urban regeneration in Hong Kong. Social Indicator Research 71.
    48. Nosratabadi. S. Mosavi. A. Keivani. R. Ardabili. S. Aram. F. (2019). State of the Art Survey of Deep Learning and Machine Learning Models for Smart Cities and Urban Sustainability. Proceedings of the International Conference on Global Research and Education. Balatonfüred. Hungary. 4–7 Springer: Cham. Germany. [In Persian]
    49. ODPM (2006). UK Presidency. EU Ministerial Informal on Sustainable Communities. European Evidence Review papers. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. London.
    50. Pakzad. J. (2016). The course of ideas in urban planning. New Cities Publications. [In Persian]
    51. Piras. S.. Pancottob. F. Righic. S. Vittuarid. M. Settid. M. (2021). Community social capital and status: The social dilemma of food waste. Ecological Economics. Vo:183. 106954
    52.  PoorAhmad. A.; Habibi. K. Keshavarz. M. (2010). The Evolution of the Concept of Urban Reconstruction as a New Approach in Urban Dilapidated Textures. Quarterly Journal of Iranian Islamic Studies. 1. [In Persian]
    53. Rajaee. S.A. PoorAhmad. A. Abbasi Fallah. V. (2016). Investigating the Relationship between Social Capital and the Sense of Social Security (Case Study: Varamin City). Geography. 14(48). 31-50. [In Persian]
    54. Rasouli. M.; Ahadnejad Roshti. M.; Meshkini. A.; HeidarI. T. (2019 Reconstruction analysis of urban worn-out structures with emphasis on the role and performance of local stakeholders with a futuristic approach. Journal of Urban Planning. Online publishing. [In Persian]
    55. Richards. G. & Palmer. R. (2010). Eventful Cities: Cultural Management and Urban Revitalisation. Elsevier.
    56. Roberts. P.; Sykes. H. & Granger. R. (2017). Urban Regeneration. Second Edition. SAGE Publications. New Delhi
    57. Roshani. P.; Habibi; K. Zarabadi. Z.S. (2016). Presenting a conceptual model of integration of urban space network and its application in District 6 of Tehran. Baghe Nazar. 14(48). 31-42. [In Persian]
    58. Rostami. M.R.; Fayz; D. AzimZarei. A. Rastegar; A. Maleki M. Razgah. M. (2015). Factors Affecting Islamic Branding. 26(2). 4-11. [In Persian]
    59. Sabbaghi. A. (2013). Development of a mechanism for using urban regeneration in the face of worn-out urban fabric Case study: Golan neighborhood of Hamadan. Haft Hesar urban research. 4(1). [In Persian]
    60. Safaeipour. M.. DamanBagh. S. (2019). Analysis of urban regeneration components in the dilapidated central fabric of Ahvaz. fourth year.3(51). 103-122. [In Persian]
    61. Safaeipour. M.. Madanloojibari. M. (2016). Urban land policies in the reconstruction of worn-out urban fabric. First Edition. Nibag Publishing. [In Persian]
    62. SaffariShima. A. (2015). Recreating the Concept of Urban Texture in Qazvin. Archaeological Studies of Parseh. 2(5). 95-110. [In Persian]
    63. Sarizadi. H.. Jalali. A. (2008). Investigating the feasibility of sustainable development in improving the worn-out urban fabric with using AHP hierarchical analysis process. Conference on Sustainable Architecture Areas & Urbanism.. [In Persian]
    64. Shaw. K. & Butler. T. (2020). Urban Reg eneration. International Encyclopedia of Human Geograph. 14. 97-103
    65. Tallon. A. (2010). Urban regeneration in the UK (2nd ed.). Publisher: Routledge. United Nations. (1987). Our common future. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development.
    66. Wang. L. & Ding. Y. (2017). An exemption for strong brands: the influence of brand community rejection on brand evaluation. European Journal of Marketing. 51(5/6). 1029-1048.
    67. Weddıng. G.C. & Crawford-Brown. D. (2007). Measuring site-level success in brownfield redevelopments:A focus on sustainability and green building.Journal of Environmental Management. 85(2). 483–495.
    68. Wheeler. M. & Beatley. T. (2008).. The sustainable urban development. reader (2nd ed.).Urban Reader Series. Publisher: Routledge.
    69. Zangiabadi. A.. Moayedfar. S. (2012). The approach of urban regeneration in worn-out structures: Barzan Shash Badgiri. Yazd. Armanshahr Journal of Architecture and Urban Planning. 5(9). 297-314. [In Persian]
    70. Zare Chahouki. M. A.. Sanaei. A. (2018). Payment for ecosystem services. an economic tool for the protection of natural resources. Strategic Research in Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources. 3(2). 123-134. [In Persian]