Explaining the key factors of livability of border cities with a future research approach (Case study: Zabol city)

Document Type : .

Authors

• fatemeh karimian pour ¹
• rostam saberi far ²
• seyed mehdi mousa kazemi ³

¹ payam noor university of tehran

² Payam noor- professor

³ Dep.geography of payam noor

10.30495/jupm.2022.28973.3989

Abstract

The aim of this study is to identify the key factors affecting the viability of Zabol city. Therefore, the present study is applied in terms of purpose and in terms of nature and method is based on new methods of futurology, research, analysis and exploration. In order to collect the required data and information, a questionnaire and Delphi technique and documentary studies and libraries have been used.To apply the Delphi technique and analyze the cross-effects, questionnaires have been prepared in two stages. Various and comprehensive aspects of viability have been provided to experts, which led to the general extraction of factors affecting the viability of Zabol city. The second phase includes 30 questionnaires to determine the main factors affecting the viability of Zabol city through weighting, which was completed by experts and finally used to analyze the collected data from MicMac software. The results show that among the 33 main factors affecting the survival of Zabol city, a total of 8 key variables affect the survival of Zabul city, so that these variables have the most impact and the least impact on the future of survival in Zabul city . It includes factors such as "deprivation, investment, residents' desire to live, access to infrastructure, housing and roads, urban furniture and quality of appearance, social interactions, civic and collective institutions." Due to the relationship and internal impact of these factors with each other, the quality of each of these factors should be improved.
Extended Abstract
Introduction
The city of Zabul is located in one of the most critical biological areas of the country and the border location of this city has made its life and viability faces major challenges. In fact, numerous droughts, water crises and the drying up of the largest water source in Sistan region, have faced this vast plain with major bottlenecks and turned the largest urban area of this area (Zabul city) into an unbearable settlement. The occurrence of various diseases related to dust, low efficiency of energy consumption and agricultural production, etc., has turned Zabul into a real laboratory of social, economic and environmental damage. In this regard, the main issue of the present study is to identify the key drivers affecting the viability of Zabol city. With medium and long-term planning, the existing obstacles to improving the viability of Zabul city will be removed.
Methodology
The city of Zabol is located in the southeastern corner of Iran and located at 61 degrees and 29 minutes east longitude and 31 degrees and 1 minute north latitude. According to the 2016 census, this city had a population of about 135,000 and is ranked seventh among the cities of Iran in terms of population. This research is applied in terms of purpose and in terms of nature and method is based on new methods of futurology, research, analysis and exploration. Questionnaire and Delphi technique, documentary studies and libraries have been used to collect the required data and information. To use the Delphi technique and analyze the cross-effects, questionnaires have been prepared in two stages, the first stage includes 50 open questionnaires and the second stage includes 30 questionnaires to determine the main factors affecting the viability of Zabol city through weight. That has been completed by experts and finally used to analyze the collected data MicMac software.
 
Results and discussion
Among the 33 main factors affecting the viability of Zabol city, a total of 8 key variables affect the viability of Zabol city and include factors such as "deprivation elimination, investment, residents' desire to live, access to infrastructure, housing and roads" "Urban furniture and the quality of appearance and landscape, social interactions, civic and collective institution.
Conclusion
Given the nature of these key drivers, any decision made by managers and urban planning policymakers could affect the future of border towns, and on the other hand, due to the interdependence of these factors, It is necessary to pay attention to this. Due to being in the 120-day wind corridor, the city of Zabul cannot have good living conditions, and if there is such an insistence on continuing the development and expansion of the city, fundamental changes must be made in the plans and implementation. According to studies, strategies based on the integration of indigenous knowledge and new technologies along with the dynamics and flexibility of the support and urban planning system are needed to increase cross-sectoral participation and public participation, including cellular automation of the program support system. Urban planning has shown its capabilities and efficiency with regard to current and future technologies and can address and implement the issue of infrastructure and basic land use in the city of Zabul according to global experiences.

Due to the relationship and internal impact of these factors with each other, the quality of each of these factors should be improved.
 

Keywords

• Viability
• Sustainable Development
• Border Cities
• Future Research
• Zabol

---

References

• References

  • Aliakbari, E. & Akbari, M. (2017). Structural-interpretive modeling over the viability of the metropolis of Tehran, Quarterly Journal of Spatial Planning and Planning, 21)1(,1-31. [In Persian]
  • Asyabanipour, E; Panahi, A. & Ahmadzadeh, H. (1400). Assessing and evaluating the objective dimension of urban livability in the ten metropolitan areas of Tabriz, Human Geography Research (Geographical Research), 53)2(,545-565. [In Persian]
  • Bahreini, S. H. (2000): Preparation of Sustainable Urban Guidelines and Mechanisms, Research Project Report, University of Tehran, Tehran. [In Persian]
  • Baig, F., Rana, I.A., & Talpur, M. (2019). Determining Factors Influencing Residents’ Satisfaction, International Journal of Community Well-Being, 2, 91-110.
  • Eisa Lu, A.)2015(. The idea of livability is a new approach to improving the quality of life In rural communities) Case study: Qom city, ward Kahak (Journal of Housing and Rural Environment. 120 -1.
  • Fazelnia, G. & Karimian, F. (2015). Identification and Analysis of Economic Viability Indicators of Border Rural Settlements with Emphasis on Passive Defense Considerations (Case Study: Gharghari District), Third National Conference on Environment, Energy And Bio-Defense, Mehr Arvand Higher Education Institute-Environmental Lovers Extension Group, Tehran. [In Persian]
  • Ghalejehi, M.; Bagheri, S., Ayoubi, M. & Ashnood, F. (2019). Study of the relationship between dust and mental health of Zabol medical students, Journal of Zabol Medical School, 1, 36-30. [In Persian]
  • Hakimdoost, Seyed Yaser et al. (2016). Spatial analysis of biohazardous areas and activities of rural settlements in border areas Case study: Rural settlements of Helmand city. Research Quarterly of Geographical Data, 25(99), 12-23. [In Persian]
  • Hoseinabadi, S; Yaqubzadeh, M. & Forouzan Mehr, M. (2021). Dust detection and analysis on MODIS satellite images (Case study: Zabol city), Desert Type Geographical Explorations, 1, 186-167. [In Persian]
  • Hosseinzadeh, R; Safar Alizadeh, E. & Khabazi, H. (2021). Assessing the livability of urban neighborhoods in the direction of sustainable development from the perspective of citizens, case study: Shahr Kohaneh neighborhood and Seyed Morteza-Kashmar town, Geography and Environmental Studies, 10(40), 123-140. [In Persian]
  • Khzaeinejhad, F. (2015). Environmental Analysis in the Central Part of Tehran Research: Neighborhoods of District 12, Ph.D. Thesis in Geography, University of Tehran,Tehran. [In Persian]
  • Kiani, A; Salari, S.; Biranonzadeh, M. & Bastani, A. (2014). An Analysis of Spatial Structure and Horizontal Development of Cities in Sistan Region, Journal of Urban Research and Planning, Third Year, 8, 92-77. [In Persian]
  • Leach, J. (2017). Improving City-Scale Measures of Livable Sustainability: A Study of Urban Measurement and Assessment through Application to the City of Birmingham, UK, Cities, 71, 80-87.
  • Leby, J. L. & Hashim, A. H. (2010). Livability dimensions and attributes: Their relative importance in the eyes of neighbourhood residents, Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 15(1), 67-91.
  • Liang, Li., Deng, X., Wang, P., Wang, Z., & Wang, L. (2020). Assessment of the impact of climate change on cities livability in China, Science of The Total Environment, 726, 11-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.
  • Mahmudi, M. (2015). livable streets: the effects if physical prolems on the quality and
    livability of kuala lampur streets, Cities, 43, 104-114. [In Persian]
  • Mccrea, R., & Walters, P. (2012). Impacts of Urban Consolidation on Urban Liveability: Comparing an Inner and Outer Suburb in Brisbane. Australia, Jurnal Housing, 2, 190-206.
  • Miri, F. & Turkmani, J. (2019). The rate of development of the cities of Sistan and Baluchestan province, the application of multi-criteria methods, Agricultural Economics, 1, 119-95. [In Persian]
  • Mohre kesh, B.; Saberi, H.; Momeni, M. & Azani, M. (2019). Explaining the effect of physical excess on the viability of the urban area (Case study: Isfahan city area), Geography Program Research - Urban Start, 7(2), 411-429. [In Persian]
  • Moradi Masihi, V. (2005). Strategic planning and its application in urban planning in Iran, Publications of Tehran Municipality Urban Planning and Processing Company, Tehran. [In Persian]
  • Mousavi Noor, S. A.; Waresi, H. & Mohammadi, J. (2017). Presenting a hybrid viability model of Tehran metropolis based on infrastructure indicators, 15(53), 181-204. [In Persian]
  • Mousavi Noor, S. A.; Waresi, H. & Mohammadi, J. (2017). Study and analysis of bio-personality components of Tehran metropolis, Geography Quarterly, 51, 237-258. [In Persian]
  • National Research Council (2002). Community and quality of life; data needs for informed decision making, National Academy Press, Washington.
  • Nikpour, A. & Yarahmadi, M. (2021). Effective Effect on Sustainability in Noorabad Mamasani, Quarterly Journal of Project and Urban Function Studies, 23, 7-27. https://www.elsevier.com/locate/cities. [In Persian]
  • Oselberg, D. (2012). Older people:well-being, In international encycolopedia of housing and home.
  • Perogordo M. D. (2007). The Silesia mega polis, European spatial planning, London.
  • Pourahmad, A; Darbaneh Astaneh, A.; Zanganehshahraki, S. & Pourqorban, S. (2021). Investigation and analysis of factors affecting the urban viability of Kish Island, 8(1), 1-22.
  • Radcliff, B. (2001). Politics, markets and life satisfaction: The Political economy of human happiness, American Political Science Review, 95(4), 939-955.
  • Raji, F. S. M. S. B.; Qutayan, B., Ariffin, A. S., Razali, M. N., & Kamarudin, N. (2016). Resident’s Perception on Livability in Affordable Housing in Malaysia, Journal of Technology Management and Business, 3, 11-21.
  • Samani, S.; Ebrahimzadeh, A. & Ebadipoor, M. (2019). Study of the effect of fine dust on the prevalence of respiratory disorders, Zabol Medical School, 2, 71-64. [In Persian]
  • Sasanpour F., Alizadeh, S. and Arabi Moghadam, H. (2018). Viability of urban areas of Urmia with RALSPI model, Journal of Applied Research in Geographical Sciences, 48, 241-258. [In Persian]
  • Sasanpour, F. & Jafari Asadabadi, H. (2012). Principles and characteristics of livable city, the first national conference on geography, urban planning and sustainable development, Koomesh Environmental Society, University of Aviation Industry, Tehran. [In Persian]
  • Szibbo, N. A. (2016). Assessing neighborhood livability: Evidence from LEED for neighborhood development and new urbanist communities, Articulo Journal of Urban Research, 14, 1–24.
  • Zhan, B., Pokwan, M., Zhang, W., Fan, J., & Yu, J. (2018). Assessment and determinants of satisfaction with urban livability in China, Cities, 79, 92-101.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.02.025.
  • Ziari, K.; Heydari, A.; Ghanizadeh Ghasemabadi, H. & Abazari, N. (2018). Investigating and prioritizing the components of livability in Bam city, social geography of the city, 5(1), 105-120. [In Persian]